I've tried – granted without much success -- to minimize political commentary on this blog.[1]
However, one conclusion that I think both sides can agree on is that the era of conservative white Protestant male values being the default position for political discourse is over.
These values will doubtlessly continue to be championed in the future, but the assumption that these are the only values to be aspired to has been forever blown out of the water.[2]
The GOP rightfully[3] pilloried the Democrats in the 1980s and 90s for the excesses of such politicians as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.
Fair enough, but love 'em or loathe 'em, Jackson and Sharpton were real people representing real constituencies with real points of view.
By contrast, the handful of minority and female politicians in the GOP got their tenure by rigorously adhering to those ol' conservative white Protestant male values.
As a result the Democrats learned -- slowly and painfully, to be sure -- how to listen to the Jacksons and Sharptons but -- more importantly -- how to effectively shut them down without losing their constituencies.
Instead of retreating into the comforting false security of an epistemic closure bubble, the Democrats were engaged daily in the messy but necessary politics of coalition building.
It is tempting to many -- ohhhhh, soooo tempting -- to enjoy schadenfreude over the shock and fear many Republicans feel today. On both sides of the aisle there is open speculation the GOP is on the verge of extinction while many who cling to conservative white Protestant male values fear the "loss" of their country and that at the very least God is abandoning us if not actually preparing to unleash a mighty wrathful vengeance.
People, seriously, get a grip...
The GOP isn't going to disappear. Americans enjoy their stable two-party system: It's noisy and messy and inefficient but hey, it's ours. As Rachel Maddow points out, we need both parties to suggest good counter ideas; in the ensuing debate the country figures out what it wants to do and where it wants to go.
What's going to happen is that the GOP, as the Democrats did years ago, needs to spend some time in the wilderness doing a little soul searching.
It's already showing signs of happening. Evangelicals are wondering if maybe instead of opposing gay marriage as a way of strengthening conservative white Protestant family values, it would be a better idea to get their own coreligionists to stop screwing around on their partners and getting divorced so much. And to counter the hysteria of the oh-gawd-we're-doomed-secede-from-the-US crowd, blogger Steve Elliott has posted a passage from the book of Jeremiah, "the letter to the exiles":
Life goes on. If not this, something else. Don't like the view? Just wait, the wheel turns.
E pluribus unum: From the many, one. We need to hammer out our differences, not let one point of view hammer the others flat.
.
.
.
[1] My previous post was an abstract on the efficacy of SuperPACs, not an evaluation of either party's platform.
[2] And this is not to say there is anything intrinsically wrong with such values. But as John Scalzi points out, being a conservative white Protestant male in the 20th century was like playing a video game at the easiest level. Not all conservative white Protestant males enjoyed an easy ride, but their rides were easier than those of their non-conservative non-white non-Protestant non-male neighbors.
[3] Ouch!
[4] Blogger Al Menconi publishes a somewhat similar piece reaffirming his faith in God and God's plan for everything. Al regards the result of the 2012 election as a bad choice but one that God has ordained. My question is, why assume the 2012 election results aren't exactly what God wants in order to bless this nation? Just 'cuz a big hunka registered voters are comfortable with conservative white Protestant male values doesn't mean God is.